One bit of good news is that under the new Trump administration, the exaggerated and false narrative of “white supremacy” will fade and law enforcement can focus on true crime such illegal immigrant violence and Islamic terrorism. as far as the J6 “insurrection” I note that BLM and Antifa “demonstrations” which resulted in police stations and other buildings burnt to the ground in many US cities were markedly more threatening and violent than J6 in which weapons were not recovered and not a single destructive fire was set. In short, if you were going to start a real insurrection you’d use BLM and Antifa personnel and none of the J6 defendants
Thank you for providing such rich details, not just about the ladies of J6, but the example of Charter. Violent Antifa and BLM rioters got off so easy, so I have no qualms with pardons for violent J6ers who’ve been in jail or prison for two, three, four years already. It’s weird for me to say that I support pardons for people who were violent, but they did not receive impartial justice.
You’ve just outlined why we must have public justice for all the thugs and traitors who we’ve watched disrespect our country and its citizens. We will never respond like these manipulated criminal thugs, however the most important reason for justice is: we don’t want the perception that we’ve just traded one set of corrupt masters for another. Justice for ALL who have suffered under this corrupt deep state. The rule of law requires it.
And unless we do it shows we can’t be trusted with justice. Bondi must go after the Select Committee to show to the nation what was going on. If the Great Immune members don’t want to go on trial and refute the claims, then they can sit it out and watch the revelations unfold.
Pardoned is THE LEAST of it, they need to be FULLY MADE WHOLE BY SUING AND WINNING THE 50 BILLION DOLLAR LAWS SUIT AGAINST THE CORRUPT FEDERAL GOVERNMENT!
ARREST PIGLOSI AND HANG THAT ROTTEN FUCKING CUNT LAPPING BITCH!
Here's the thing: When I give my 'anti-Trumper' husband an article like this, his response to reading it is, 'Well, there's two sides to every story - how do we know if this is the true version, when the author doesn't include evidence for his claims?'
So, I think it would be helpful to getting the 'message' to the public at large if you presented point for point, irrefutable videos, court testimony, evidence, etc. in such articles, they might, succeed in convincing to your reader's loved ones, friends, extended family, etc. that 'We the people" are being lied to.
(Bear with me, the following is long, but provides crucial context to the conclusion)
Now - my husband and I still subscribe to our local newspaper (I tell you, it is chilling to open a newspaper I've been reading for over 60 years and find so many outright lies reported as true!),
and inside the paper's front cover is listed the entire staff, from Senior Editor to Opinions columnist, and I feel certain that most of the writers are simply unaware that many of the stories their 'bosses' approve for printing are outright lies...
So, if writers such as yourself would consistently (along with showing the dichotomies as you've done above) back every claim with the irrefutable proof, people like me could attempt to make headway in disseminating such Truths through a wide variety of outlets.
For example: I could send a copy of such an article to every staff member of my local paper urging the recipients to discuss among themselves the possible reasons for -
A. the government's lies about the events and
B. the corporate media's coverage of the untrue versions of those events.
Of course, the 'enlightening' of these staff reporters/etc. likely would not result in changes being made to mainstream news coverage of world events, but....
...there would be a whole lot of friends, family, & connections thereof who would certainly be receiving the real truth about government/media lies from sources they deem trustworthy, due to being personally known (whether first or secondhand) for journalistic integrity..
Otherwise, writers such as yourself are doing little more than 'preaching to your choirs'...
One bit of good news is that under the new Trump administration, the exaggerated and false narrative of “white supremacy” will fade and law enforcement can focus on true crime such illegal immigrant violence and Islamic terrorism. as far as the J6 “insurrection” I note that BLM and Antifa “demonstrations” which resulted in police stations and other buildings burnt to the ground in many US cities were markedly more threatening and violent than J6 in which weapons were not recovered and not a single destructive fire was set. In short, if you were going to start a real insurrection you’d use BLM and Antifa personnel and none of the J6 defendants
Thank you for providing such rich details, not just about the ladies of J6, but the example of Charter. Violent Antifa and BLM rioters got off so easy, so I have no qualms with pardons for violent J6ers who’ve been in jail or prison for two, three, four years already. It’s weird for me to say that I support pardons for people who were violent, but they did not receive impartial justice.
Well done.
Thanks for this sharp perspective, Jack.
You’ve just outlined why we must have public justice for all the thugs and traitors who we’ve watched disrespect our country and its citizens. We will never respond like these manipulated criminal thugs, however the most important reason for justice is: we don’t want the perception that we’ve just traded one set of corrupt masters for another. Justice for ALL who have suffered under this corrupt deep state. The rule of law requires it.
Blessings.🙏🇺🇸
And unless we do it shows we can’t be trusted with justice. Bondi must go after the Select Committee to show to the nation what was going on. If the Great Immune members don’t want to go on trial and refute the claims, then they can sit it out and watch the revelations unfold.
Pardoned is THE LEAST of it, they need to be FULLY MADE WHOLE BY SUING AND WINNING THE 50 BILLION DOLLAR LAWS SUIT AGAINST THE CORRUPT FEDERAL GOVERNMENT!
ARREST PIGLOSI AND HANG THAT ROTTEN FUCKING CUNT LAPPING BITCH!
Here's the thing: When I give my 'anti-Trumper' husband an article like this, his response to reading it is, 'Well, there's two sides to every story - how do we know if this is the true version, when the author doesn't include evidence for his claims?'
So, I think it would be helpful to getting the 'message' to the public at large if you presented point for point, irrefutable videos, court testimony, evidence, etc. in such articles, they might, succeed in convincing to your reader's loved ones, friends, extended family, etc. that 'We the people" are being lied to.
(Bear with me, the following is long, but provides crucial context to the conclusion)
Now - my husband and I still subscribe to our local newspaper (I tell you, it is chilling to open a newspaper I've been reading for over 60 years and find so many outright lies reported as true!),
and inside the paper's front cover is listed the entire staff, from Senior Editor to Opinions columnist, and I feel certain that most of the writers are simply unaware that many of the stories their 'bosses' approve for printing are outright lies...
So, if writers such as yourself would consistently (along with showing the dichotomies as you've done above) back every claim with the irrefutable proof, people like me could attempt to make headway in disseminating such Truths through a wide variety of outlets.
For example: I could send a copy of such an article to every staff member of my local paper urging the recipients to discuss among themselves the possible reasons for -
A. the government's lies about the events and
B. the corporate media's coverage of the untrue versions of those events.
Of course, the 'enlightening' of these staff reporters/etc. likely would not result in changes being made to mainstream news coverage of world events, but....
...there would be a whole lot of friends, family, & connections thereof who would certainly be receiving the real truth about government/media lies from sources they deem trustworthy, due to being personally known (whether first or secondhand) for journalistic integrity..
Otherwise, writers such as yourself are doing little more than 'preaching to your choirs'...
Carol, as you suggest, the sharing is the critical part of the communications process. Today, everyone can be his or her own aggregator of the news.