The fever swamps (of which I am a denizen) are speculating Iran was used as a tool for perpetual Middle East unrest by the Brits, still playing the Great Game. This feels right.
Cutting out Lloyds of London from the shipping insurance market was a crafty play.
But pounding the Brits seems like a case of bouncing the rubble, since they self-destroying themselves with Islamic immigration as we speak.
I have stopped using Google AI altogether since the programmers of that AI seem to have programmed it to lie, leave out pertinent but inconvenient data, and intentionally mislead its users. I do still add a script for Grok, accompanying every question to limit AI hallucinations and any reliance of social media posts for information but Grok is trainable to produce credible information, while I don’t think Google AI is fixable, if you want reliable data.
Here is an example of a recent prompt I used with my script. I modify the prompt depending upon the question but it will give you are good idea.
Methodology: In answering this question, I want you to provide only information supported by historical records, primary sources, or other credible sources about this topic. This begs the question of what I consider credible sources so here are some examples:
Credible sources generally include peer-reviewed academic journals (e.g., from JSTOR, PubMed), official government or institutional archives (e.g., Library of Congress, National Archives), reputable books with publisher details and page numbers, and established news outlets (e.g., Reuters, BBC, AP) with links to articles.
Since many of my questions are theological in nature. I would consider the Bible itself, academic resources like the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, digital libraries such as the Open Access Digital Theological Library and the Theological Commons, theological journals, and university-affiliated websites to be credible sources. Another example would be that I find websites such as csntm.org or https://www.uni-muenster.de/INTF/en/institut/index.html to be credible sources for information on or about questions related to the New Testament manuscripts.
In contrast, I don’t consider many websites by Christian Apologists (who often exaggerate the evidence for the reliability of the New Testament Manuscripts) or websites by critics (who often exaggerate the problems with the manuscripts) to be reliable sources.
I don’t require a person, used as a cited source, to have a ThD or PhD before I consider them to be a credible source but if they are addressing a question, in their specific field of study, that level of education gives them more credibility in my mind.
One example would be that many sources claim by using ELS (Equidistant Letter Sequences) or breaking down the opening word in Genesis or the meanings of the names in the genealogy in Genesis 5, that coded messages can be found. Dr. Michael Brown is a Christian scholar whose specific area of study is ancient near-eastern languages, so he would be an example of a credible source on that subject, while I would consider many of the other sources on these questions to be highly speculative and unreliable.
Consider what primary sources or documented evidence say about this topic, and use your tools (e.g., web search, page browsing) to fetch and cross-verify facts across at least 2-3 independent sources for consensus.
Include references to any credible sources used, formatted as online citations with specific details such as book titles/authors/page numbers, full links to academic papers or articles.
Avoid speculation beyond any speculation already contained in the cited sources, and if credible evidence is limited, conflicting, or absent, state this absence clearly and refuse to speculate.
Do not use Wikipedia or posts on any social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, or X as sources—if X tools are relevant, limit your results to information from verified institutional accounts or linked credible content, but prioritize non-social media sources.
While I will attempt to break down complex questions, I want you to examine my questions to see if a further breakdown would be beneficial for a complete understanding. If so, then further breakdown my questions to create a step-by-step explanation of the known aspects of the topic based on historical records and literary evidence, using chain-of-thought reasoning and all tools available to you for the verification of any information in your answer.
Confirmation Bias Protection: Not only are humans prone to confirmation biases, I have noticed in my interactions with several AI programs, that AI programming seems to be aimed at giving the users the answers the AI thinks the users want to hear. I’m stating my hypothesis or observation with each question, so we know which direction my bias is already leaning. I want you to look at all sides of the issue and if the evidence doesn’t support my hypothesis or observation, provide that dissenting information and falsify my hypothesis if it is not supported by the evidence. I do not want you to only look for data that supports my hypothesis or observation.
The one confirmation bias that I do want you to embrace, when it comes to the Bible, is that I assume it to be inspired scripture. While I acknowledge that there are manuscripts supporting multiple versions of both Old Testament and New Testament books and embrace the idea that the biblical writers employed a wide variety of compositional devices, which included many devices not conducive to a literal reading, I believe that all Bible Difficulties can be resolved, even if I don’t see how they are resolved now (e.g., Freewill versus Predestination present a tension in scripture that I have never seen adequately resolved but I assume that a resolution does exist). So, while I want you to present information that is contrary to that bias, I also want you to start with the assumption that a resolution is possible. However, if even when given that benefit of the doubt you are still unable to resolve a Bible Difficulty explain the difficulty and why you were unable to resolve it in your answer.
Answer Format: Avoid presenting that data in a chart format, unless it is necessary for clarity.
If using dates please use the B.C./A.D. format, rather than BCE/CE format. If citing the Bible in your answer, use the ESV whenever possible. However, if citing verses not included in the ESV (e.g. the Apocrypha, of other literature) use the English translation of your choice.
When citing the Bible use the ESV, whenever possible. Occasionally English translations of the Septuagint (LXX) differ significantly from the Old Testament found in the ESV, (which uses the Masoretic Text (MT) as its primary source for translation). If your answer includes a citation of an Old Testament Passage and there exist substantive differences between the translation of the passage in the ESV and an English Translation of the Septuagint, provide both the ESV and an English translation of the LXX. To clarify, when saying, “substantive differences” I mean differences which significantly alter the meaning of the text (e.g., whether the nations were divided according to the number of the sons of God, or the sons of Israel in (Deut. 32:8). I’m not interested in minor differences in word choices by the translators.
My Observation: Once I consider things like genre, the various levels of context (historical, political, cultural, literary, etc.) and the various compositional devices used, the next thing I look for, to help me understand the authorial intent is, how the biblical authors engaged in intertextuality. It provides me some of my best insights into the intended meaning of the author. I’m planning a chapter by chapter deep dive into the The Book of Acts.
My Task For Grok: Examine the scripture and academic sources related to Acts chapter 24 and provide me any examples of either the author of Acts using earlier revelation intertextually in this chapter, or if applicable, later writers engaging with this chapter of Acts intertextually. Please cite the passages being referred to intertextually and explain how the author is using that reference in his current letter (e.g., is he grounding what he is saying in existing revelation, or reinterpreting/repurposing the existing reference to make a new theological point). Is the intertextual reference a direct quite, paraphrase, allusion or part of an echo based on themes found in the OT?
Similarly to the way, when addressing a jackass, you first have to get its attention by whacking it with a 2x4, interactions with AI or Google should begin with "Listen up, you stupid fucking robot!"
The passage is a mixture of real people, real grievances (Lokhova’s experience), unverified claims, conspiracy narratives, fabricated travel events andassertions contradicted by official investigations.
Watergate was a fraternity prank compared to the dirty dealing democrat-ICK party and their actual scandalous russian collusion. Maybe the King will show some measure of sac and play Deep Throat.
The not-so-subtle messaging of James Bond movies was that the British were smarter and craftier than us Yanks, and we were damn lucky to have them as friends.
Today, that "friendship" needs very careful re-examination, with both eyes open to current reality and adverse trends. Our sentimental love for The Beatles, Diana Rigg, and sports cars that overheat in summertime should have nothing to do with this assessment.
Where are the “No Kings” protesters today??? We have an actual KING here in our country!!! What an opportunity to show the world just how much we disapprove of KINGS!!!
I'd ask him what Boris Johnson said to Zelinsky to make him not sign the previously agreed upon peace deal with Russia prior to their military operation.
Svetlana Lokhova was attacked, cut off by friends and distrusted by colleagues because she was accused of being a Russian agent who “seduced” General Michael Flynn by the U.S. government and the Democratic Party. The King knows well that Britain played an important role in that. Barack Obama and John Brennan both paid visits to Britain and no doubt set up Russiagate and helped run the operation from there. They were assisted by folks like Christopher Steele, Stefan Halper and Richard Dearlove. DNI Director Tulsi Gabbard confirmed that Barack Obama was the ring leader behind Russiagate and visited London to set the whole thing in motion. Framing Trump as a Russian asset and an agent of Vladimir Putin would discredit him and get him impeached so the Democrats and the intelligence community could get rid of someone they saw as a threat to national security as they saw it.
Svetlana Lokhova was merely the collateral damage of this plot, if her innocent life had to be destroyed to get rid of Trump so be it. Obama, Brennan and their British allies had no problem destroying her in the name of their ultimate goal. King Charles III should cooperate fully with President Trump in the Russiagate investigation and release any and all documents relevant to the investigation to his administration. He should also provide Trump and Acting AG Todd Blanche with the names of folks Obama and Brennan met in London a few years ago. Christopher Steele, Stefan Halper and Richard Dearlove should be arrested by the British authorities on charges of participating in a criminal conspiracy. John Brennan should be arrested and charged with high treason. Barack Obama should be subpoenaed and made to come before Congress and answer for his role on all this. The U.S. government should give an official apology to Svetlana Lokhova and General Michael Flynn and pay both of them reparations.
Infuriatingly and sadly 'these people' don't 'give a rat's ass'. They should be brought into our Courts, made to defend themselves with their own 'pieces of silver', punished by the 'process of justice' and bankrupted like Michael Flynn.
I had no idea the links between the British government and the attempts to sabotage the Trump presidency, even contributing actively to the lies perpetrated during the Russiagate attempted coup - and I don't mean contributing a little, or contribution by low-level operatives. I mean the Crown itself. And given how Trump is completely dismantling the British economy and its elite hangers-on, including - and especially - the Lloyds of London's monopoly, which they attempted to use to stop tankers and all other commercial travel through the Strait of Hormuz, I can see how they consider him an existential threat.
Boy is this administration tearing the corrupt bastards' playhouse down! No wonder they are desperate to kill him.
WOW! Just WOW! I learn so much reading your columns! I wish there were repercussions for their treachery because this is wrong on so many levels. They do not love our country and that is the greatest evil. Nothing matters more than maintaining their wealth and power. I hope there is a special Hell for them because I fear they will never face justice in this life.
"Two years later, working with the FBI on its Crossfire Hurricane investigation, Halper persuaded the FBI that Lokhova, a British citizen, was a Russian Spy who seduced the gullible Flynn."
Who at the FBI was the one supposedly "persuaded"?!! Knowing the serpents working at the Bureau, there probably wasn't too much persuasion needed.
I want Alberta and Saskatchewan to emerge from Canada as a 250th
Frankly Uncle Chuck of Knottingham Y’all Outdid Urself’s present to destroy Canada, the Royal Family with the Muslims and y’all surrender your rights to our debt as an apology for being assholes since 1776!
You surrender your NUKES with France by Memorial Day and buy 100% of energy from 🇺🇸 and accept the EU is our little bitch now….
I’d say they have been screwing with us since 1760, hot wars 1775-1784, sabotaging from 1784 to the Treaty of Ghent in 1815. Since then, clandestine undermining except for the world war periods.
Excellent writeup.
The fever swamps (of which I am a denizen) are speculating Iran was used as a tool for perpetual Middle East unrest by the Brits, still playing the Great Game. This feels right.
Cutting out Lloyds of London from the shipping insurance market was a crafty play.
But pounding the Brits seems like a case of bouncing the rubble, since they self-destroying themselves with Islamic immigration as we speak.
I have stopped using Google AI altogether since the programmers of that AI seem to have programmed it to lie, leave out pertinent but inconvenient data, and intentionally mislead its users. I do still add a script for Grok, accompanying every question to limit AI hallucinations and any reliance of social media posts for information but Grok is trainable to produce credible information, while I don’t think Google AI is fixable, if you want reliable data.
Now you got me interested. Do tell more about the script! My next project is to learn to use Grok more intelligently.
Here is an example of a recent prompt I used with my script. I modify the prompt depending upon the question but it will give you are good idea.
Methodology: In answering this question, I want you to provide only information supported by historical records, primary sources, or other credible sources about this topic. This begs the question of what I consider credible sources so here are some examples:
Credible sources generally include peer-reviewed academic journals (e.g., from JSTOR, PubMed), official government or institutional archives (e.g., Library of Congress, National Archives), reputable books with publisher details and page numbers, and established news outlets (e.g., Reuters, BBC, AP) with links to articles.
Since many of my questions are theological in nature. I would consider the Bible itself, academic resources like the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, digital libraries such as the Open Access Digital Theological Library and the Theological Commons, theological journals, and university-affiliated websites to be credible sources. Another example would be that I find websites such as csntm.org or https://www.uni-muenster.de/INTF/en/institut/index.html to be credible sources for information on or about questions related to the New Testament manuscripts.
In contrast, I don’t consider many websites by Christian Apologists (who often exaggerate the evidence for the reliability of the New Testament Manuscripts) or websites by critics (who often exaggerate the problems with the manuscripts) to be reliable sources.
I don’t require a person, used as a cited source, to have a ThD or PhD before I consider them to be a credible source but if they are addressing a question, in their specific field of study, that level of education gives them more credibility in my mind.
One example would be that many sources claim by using ELS (Equidistant Letter Sequences) or breaking down the opening word in Genesis or the meanings of the names in the genealogy in Genesis 5, that coded messages can be found. Dr. Michael Brown is a Christian scholar whose specific area of study is ancient near-eastern languages, so he would be an example of a credible source on that subject, while I would consider many of the other sources on these questions to be highly speculative and unreliable.
Consider what primary sources or documented evidence say about this topic, and use your tools (e.g., web search, page browsing) to fetch and cross-verify facts across at least 2-3 independent sources for consensus.
Include references to any credible sources used, formatted as online citations with specific details such as book titles/authors/page numbers, full links to academic papers or articles.
Avoid speculation beyond any speculation already contained in the cited sources, and if credible evidence is limited, conflicting, or absent, state this absence clearly and refuse to speculate.
Do not use Wikipedia or posts on any social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, or X as sources—if X tools are relevant, limit your results to information from verified institutional accounts or linked credible content, but prioritize non-social media sources.
While I will attempt to break down complex questions, I want you to examine my questions to see if a further breakdown would be beneficial for a complete understanding. If so, then further breakdown my questions to create a step-by-step explanation of the known aspects of the topic based on historical records and literary evidence, using chain-of-thought reasoning and all tools available to you for the verification of any information in your answer.
Confirmation Bias Protection: Not only are humans prone to confirmation biases, I have noticed in my interactions with several AI programs, that AI programming seems to be aimed at giving the users the answers the AI thinks the users want to hear. I’m stating my hypothesis or observation with each question, so we know which direction my bias is already leaning. I want you to look at all sides of the issue and if the evidence doesn’t support my hypothesis or observation, provide that dissenting information and falsify my hypothesis if it is not supported by the evidence. I do not want you to only look for data that supports my hypothesis or observation.
The one confirmation bias that I do want you to embrace, when it comes to the Bible, is that I assume it to be inspired scripture. While I acknowledge that there are manuscripts supporting multiple versions of both Old Testament and New Testament books and embrace the idea that the biblical writers employed a wide variety of compositional devices, which included many devices not conducive to a literal reading, I believe that all Bible Difficulties can be resolved, even if I don’t see how they are resolved now (e.g., Freewill versus Predestination present a tension in scripture that I have never seen adequately resolved but I assume that a resolution does exist). So, while I want you to present information that is contrary to that bias, I also want you to start with the assumption that a resolution is possible. However, if even when given that benefit of the doubt you are still unable to resolve a Bible Difficulty explain the difficulty and why you were unable to resolve it in your answer.
Answer Format: Avoid presenting that data in a chart format, unless it is necessary for clarity.
If using dates please use the B.C./A.D. format, rather than BCE/CE format. If citing the Bible in your answer, use the ESV whenever possible. However, if citing verses not included in the ESV (e.g. the Apocrypha, of other literature) use the English translation of your choice.
When citing the Bible use the ESV, whenever possible. Occasionally English translations of the Septuagint (LXX) differ significantly from the Old Testament found in the ESV, (which uses the Masoretic Text (MT) as its primary source for translation). If your answer includes a citation of an Old Testament Passage and there exist substantive differences between the translation of the passage in the ESV and an English Translation of the Septuagint, provide both the ESV and an English translation of the LXX. To clarify, when saying, “substantive differences” I mean differences which significantly alter the meaning of the text (e.g., whether the nations were divided according to the number of the sons of God, or the sons of Israel in (Deut. 32:8). I’m not interested in minor differences in word choices by the translators.
My Observation: Once I consider things like genre, the various levels of context (historical, political, cultural, literary, etc.) and the various compositional devices used, the next thing I look for, to help me understand the authorial intent is, how the biblical authors engaged in intertextuality. It provides me some of my best insights into the intended meaning of the author. I’m planning a chapter by chapter deep dive into the The Book of Acts.
My Task For Grok: Examine the scripture and academic sources related to Acts chapter 24 and provide me any examples of either the author of Acts using earlier revelation intertextually in this chapter, or if applicable, later writers engaging with this chapter of Acts intertextually. Please cite the passages being referred to intertextually and explain how the author is using that reference in his current letter (e.g., is he grounding what he is saying in existing revelation, or reinterpreting/repurposing the existing reference to make a new theological point). Is the intertextual reference a direct quite, paraphrase, allusion or part of an echo based on themes found in the OT?
That's pretty encyclopedic. My only prompt is: exclude any reference to any article on Wikipedia.
I did a lot of experimenting using AI for research. Each section of the prompt was added in response to previous problematic responses from AI.
Similarly to the way, when addressing a jackass, you first have to get its attention by whacking it with a 2x4, interactions with AI or Google should begin with "Listen up, you stupid fucking robot!"
The passage is a mixture of real people, real grievances (Lokhova’s experience), unverified claims, conspiracy narratives, fabricated travel events andassertions contradicted by official investigations.
Watergate was a fraternity prank compared to the dirty dealing democrat-ICK party and their actual scandalous russian collusion. Maybe the King will show some measure of sac and play Deep Throat.
The not-so-subtle messaging of James Bond movies was that the British were smarter and craftier than us Yanks, and we were damn lucky to have them as friends.
Today, that "friendship" needs very careful re-examination, with both eyes open to current reality and adverse trends. Our sentimental love for The Beatles, Diana Rigg, and sports cars that overheat in summertime should have nothing to do with this assessment.
The British are a dangerously desperate, dying breed.
Too many years under the rule of a kakistocracy.
Diana Rigg and sports cars, well, I did have the cars
Where are the “No Kings” protesters today??? We have an actual KING here in our country!!! What an opportunity to show the world just how much we disapprove of KINGS!!!
Etc…
I'd ask him what Boris Johnson said to Zelinsky to make him not sign the previously agreed upon peace deal with Russia prior to their military operation.
Especially since he’s a party to it.
Svetlana Lokhova was attacked, cut off by friends and distrusted by colleagues because she was accused of being a Russian agent who “seduced” General Michael Flynn by the U.S. government and the Democratic Party. The King knows well that Britain played an important role in that. Barack Obama and John Brennan both paid visits to Britain and no doubt set up Russiagate and helped run the operation from there. They were assisted by folks like Christopher Steele, Stefan Halper and Richard Dearlove. DNI Director Tulsi Gabbard confirmed that Barack Obama was the ring leader behind Russiagate and visited London to set the whole thing in motion. Framing Trump as a Russian asset and an agent of Vladimir Putin would discredit him and get him impeached so the Democrats and the intelligence community could get rid of someone they saw as a threat to national security as they saw it.
Svetlana Lokhova was merely the collateral damage of this plot, if her innocent life had to be destroyed to get rid of Trump so be it. Obama, Brennan and their British allies had no problem destroying her in the name of their ultimate goal. King Charles III should cooperate fully with President Trump in the Russiagate investigation and release any and all documents relevant to the investigation to his administration. He should also provide Trump and Acting AG Todd Blanche with the names of folks Obama and Brennan met in London a few years ago. Christopher Steele, Stefan Halper and Richard Dearlove should be arrested by the British authorities on charges of participating in a criminal conspiracy. John Brennan should be arrested and charged with high treason. Barack Obama should be subpoenaed and made to come before Congress and answer for his role on all this. The U.S. government should give an official apology to Svetlana Lokhova and General Michael Flynn and pay both of them reparations.
Agreed! So disgusting! Evil!
Outstanding work. These people need to pay, they do not how many lives they destroy.
Al,
Infuriatingly and sadly 'these people' don't 'give a rat's ass'. They should be brought into our Courts, made to defend themselves with their own 'pieces of silver', punished by the 'process of justice' and bankrupted like Michael Flynn.
And they included Flynn’s son, a total disgrace they have weaponized the legal system while their buds run free.
Jack - what a small world. I have been listening to this lady's videos for some time now, and this one just popped up:
https://youtu.be/LGmXaSKGpdY?si=SzgOmdYUMXqnKjWr
I had no idea the links between the British government and the attempts to sabotage the Trump presidency, even contributing actively to the lies perpetrated during the Russiagate attempted coup - and I don't mean contributing a little, or contribution by low-level operatives. I mean the Crown itself. And given how Trump is completely dismantling the British economy and its elite hangers-on, including - and especially - the Lloyds of London's monopoly, which they attempted to use to stop tankers and all other commercial travel through the Strait of Hormuz, I can see how they consider him an existential threat.
Boy is this administration tearing the corrupt bastards' playhouse down! No wonder they are desperate to kill him.
WOW! Just WOW! I learn so much reading your columns! I wish there were repercussions for their treachery because this is wrong on so many levels. They do not love our country and that is the greatest evil. Nothing matters more than maintaining their wealth and power. I hope there is a special Hell for them because I fear they will never face justice in this life.
A MUST READ from Jack- so much interesting information and who would trust Google searches ever again. There is no trust in MSM among Patriots.
Andrew skates for rape as well as
"Two years later, working with the FBI on its Crossfire Hurricane investigation, Halper persuaded the FBI that Lokhova, a British citizen, was a Russian Spy who seduced the gullible Flynn."
Who at the FBI was the one supposedly "persuaded"?!! Knowing the serpents working at the Bureau, there probably wasn't too much persuasion needed.
It’s not as if Trump has forgotten or forgiven Russiagate. I’m certain he brought it up privately.
I want Alberta and Saskatchewan to emerge from Canada as a 250th
Frankly Uncle Chuck of Knottingham Y’all Outdid Urself’s present to destroy Canada, the Royal Family with the Muslims and y’all surrender your rights to our debt as an apology for being assholes since 1776!
You surrender your NUKES with France by Memorial Day and buy 100% of energy from 🇺🇸 and accept the EU is our little bitch now….
Thank you for your attention to this matter
Have. A Blessed Day now
I’d say they have been screwing with us since 1760, hot wars 1775-1784, sabotaging from 1784 to the Treaty of Ghent in 1815. Since then, clandestine undermining except for the world war periods.
Yep
This is huge
Redo the SOUTH now
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/04/29/us/supreme-court-voting-rights