Candace was very normal until recently. Then she had four children, spaced as fast as her husband (or someone) could get his pants on the bedpost. Aside from the usual female crazy, post-partum craziness is well-known; most common is depression - but other forms exist - and I must wonder if all this hormonal whipsawing has induced a particularly malignant form of post-partum psychosis.
I have also considered Ms. Owens bizarre behavior to possibly be induced by her back-to-back pregnancies.
If not for her dogging Mrs. Macron, I would suspect her behavior towards Erica to be a result of possibly having amorous feelings toward Charlie that were dashed when he wed Erica.
Maybe someone could start looking at Candace who seems to be so sure the guy being tried is not the killer or something.
Charlie and Candace were BEST FRIENDS, right up until the day he was murdered.
Candace worked with Charlie at TPUSA for years. Toured the world with him. They got famous together.
Then someone ASSASSINATED Candace's best friend, on a livestream, in 4K.
And you wonder WHY Candace is enraged?
Are you mentally challenged?
Imagine your best friend was slaughtered right in front of you. Then understand that when you started looking at THE FACTS surrounding the "official" story of his death that NOTHING ADDED UP!
Then you start investigating, you watch the actual video of Charlie getting shot from the TPUSA feed, you clearly see NO BULLET exiting Charlies neck after he was "supposedly" shot by a rifle that is used to kill a Bull Moose at 1,000 yards. Then the police admit that the "supposed" rifle found at the crime scene WAS NOT THERE during their initial search of that area. Somehow THE FBI "found" it later on.
There's so much more than that here. Yet you just refuse to review the evidence. You cast aspersions for no actual reason at Candace.
Likely because it makes you "FEEL" a certain way.
Stop being LAZY! Go watch her shows. ALL of them, it might take you 3 days. THEN you will have earned the right to call her names.
Now you are just bloviating to make yourself feel virtuous. Which is despicable by the way.
"Nonsense" like Tucker and Meghan Kelly both stating that they were best friends. Like the constant stream of text messages FROM CHARLIE that Candace has repeatedly show to the public? "Nonsense" like EVERYONE at TPUSA admitting that Charlie and Candace were best friends? You are just LYING, the question is why?
You mean the text messages from years ago? EVERYONE (what’s with the random upper case words?) at TPUSA "admits they were best friends"?? Where is that documented? You don’t think Charlies’s best friend was the woman he chose to be his wife, mother to his children, and business partner? You sound irrational. Just like Candace.
Two things, Candace has showed messages from 2025 and from all the years before that, go find me the TPUSA post denying that Candace's messages are real. Erika has Charlies phone. She can prove Candace is lying in two seconds. Has she done that?
Go on, get off your butt and do the work.
I'll be right here when you realize you can't find them.
Charlie got played by a psychopathic social climber with a fraudster for a mother.
Sadly it happens every day to all kinds of men.
Even the truly brilliant ones. They never see it coming.
I'm not sure how you got that I view having children as a negative. My daughter is one of the greatest blessings in my life! My point, as has also been expressed by others, is that having children in close succession puts an enormous strain on a woman's body. The hormones do have a huge effect on the mother and if she doesn't allow her body enough time to rebound before the next pregnancy, the effects both long and short term can be devastating.
There was a woman in our home school group who suffered depression with each additional child she bore. By the time the 9th baby came along, she was really suffering greatly. It wasn't that she didn't want or love her babies, each one. She was an amazing mother. But the postpartum emotional effects got worse with each baby.
Postpartum depression, etc. IS a thing and the effects of postpartum hormones affects every woman differently. It is not a reason to not have babies, but maybe to be aware of the effects and allow your body to fully recover before having another baby would be beneficial to the mom, the baby, and the entire family.
So yes, I do believe it is very possible Ms. Owens can be suffering from a postpartum induced psychosis.
Candace is living in an extraordinarily dark and negative space. That is not good or normal. Once upon a time not too distant ago, she was a bright, happy, smart, impressive young woman. Nowadays she is carrying some really bad juju. All these people coming to her defense, are doing her a great disservice if they tell her they are her friends. A true friend would try to talk her down and certainly offer copious prayers for Candace and her family. She's not in a good place. She might need some serious spiritual direction. This must be absolute hell for her husband and children.
I'm sorry, I didn't mean it that way. I have a son and homeschooled him as well. He's grown now and married. I have 3 grandchildren. I also homeschooled him through the 8th grade. I have known women in my homeschool group who had 5 to 8 children; some did well, and others did not. We supported each other and carried each other's burdens.
Only God knows if there have been friends who have talked to her and prayed for her. I think they have. I'm praying for her and her family.
I watch Candace's show. I don't agree with everything she says. I watch others investigating the same thing. To me, it's like watching the 48 Hours Show, who did it, what was the motive, etc.
You seem to be a very kind, compassionate, and intuitive person. I say let's agree to keep her in our prayers.
I have often said the same thing about Candace’s pregnancies: Four kids in five years can wreak havoc on your hormones. 😩 She’s gone off the deep end, IMO.
The best theory that I have heard is that Candace wanted to be more than friends with Charlie. When he spurned her, Candace was deeply hurt. Once Charlie died, Candace saw her chance to get back at Erica for taking “her man.”
It’s not only that Candace is mentioning the oddities about Erika: Candace is claiming that Erika (and other members of TPUSA) is somehow complicit in her husband‘s murder. That’s the crux.
She has no straight line evidence even remotely connecting Erika with helping to kill Charlie. Instead, she’s doing this drip, drip, drip of pointing out Erika‘s peccadillos and inconsistencies under the GUISE of trying to prove Erika is involved somehow and destroying her reputation in the process.
Candace clearly doesn’t give a flip about Charlie, or his parents, or his sister or his kids.
It’s disgusting, vile behavior from Candace—and I’m saying that as someone who was a big fan of hers for years.
Do you somehow think this intellectual GARBAGE is going to convince anyone that you are correct in any way?
Make your case. Explain how Charlie got shot by a guy who had never been to UVU before in his life with a gun that COULD NOT POSSIBLY HAVE BEEN THE MURDER WEAPON.
Go on, MAKE THE CASE!
You don't get to just come on here and INSULT people and pretend you have an arguement
I never said that Snow was not at Fort Huachuca; I know he was there. But he confirmed that people were there who were not there and they all had alibis. Yet, Candace propped him up as being a game changer. He’s a grifter. He said the Zodiac Killer was his dad.🤦🏾♀️ If he was such a game changer, then how come Candace isn’t referencing him now? That’s what she does. Her theories fall through the cracks and she pivots to something else.
Egyptian planes DEBUNKED: Check out Kanekoa the Great’s 12/15/25 debunking, PROVING that 66% of Candace’s plane locations were wrong. 60% placed them on the wrong continent.
Candace went online shortly afterwards admitting that her spreadsheet was misleading, and that she was going to correct it. She never did. Still waiting…
So if you still believe the stuff that she’s putting out, I don’t know what to tell you.
And please don’t assume that I believe that Tyler Robinson is the one who killed Charlie. Never said I believed that. But I also don’t believe that Erika or anybody at TPUSA are complicit in his murder.
If she went to the authorities with this so-called evidence, she’d be laughed out of the precinct. They wouldn’t even convene a grand jury on these half-a$$ed speculations.
Bottom line: She needs to show us some concrete, straight-line evidence linking Erika to Charlie’s murder— not the fact that Erika used the word “morfar” instead of “farfar”. Good grief!
If she can’t provide tangible evidence, then she needs to SIT DOWN and raise her four young kids that she had in five years. Pretty sure she is hormonally imbalanced right now.
You might want to start watching her series on Erika and her past. It's not looking good for the sequin robot. She's from the shadiest possible family background. Her biography is littered with lies. Every day that goes by it looks more and more like Charlie was Honey-potted by Erika. Which means it's likely that TPUSA WAS INVOLVED in Charlie's murder via complicity at the least(Tyler Bowyer introduced Charlie to Erika). You can dislike Candace all you want to BUT, she is doing all of us a huge service by SHINING A SPOTLIGHT on the attempted cover-up of Charlie's assassination. He was ORDERED dead. Tyler Robinson is just the patsy. Candace is not law-enforcement, she SHOULD NOT HAVE TO LEAD THIS INVESTIGATION! The FBI and The Utah PD are compromised. Which should be obvious to all by now. Candace does have a GIANT MICROPHONE though, and that might just be enough to bring about some actual justice. For once.
Candace has absolutely implicated Erika in Charlie’s murder. What do you think the Egyptian planes and Fort Huachuca were about?! Both of which have been thoroughly debunked: the planes by Kanekoa on X and the fort by everybody else, because her guest Mitch Snow was a known liar!
Don’t you get it? That’s what Candace does: She throws “questions” out there that seem suspicious and DEMANDS that Erika and everybody else answer those so-called questions. If they don’t, then they MUST be guilty.
Meanwhile, after Kanekoa embarrassed her on X about the planes, she acknowledged that there was something wrong with one of her columns on her chart, and that she would correct it and post it on her website. That was TWO MONTHS ago. I’m still waiting. No apologies from her about that smear against Erika.
Same thing with Mitch Snow. His recollections of what happened at Fort Huachuca, and who he saw there were again, thoroughly debunked. And what does she do? She hosted an X Space to talk about it, got tripped up a couple times, but never apologized to Erika for that debacle. She just leaves it in the universe for people to still think negatively about Erika with the particular incidents.
When is Candace going to answer questions about all of her evidence against Erika and others that turned out to be fake?
When is she going to correct and apologize for the proven damage that she has done so far?
Mitch Snow WAS at Fort Huachuca on the day he claimed.
Who he saw is speculative as Candace has always stated.
Erika has provided ZERO confirmed alibi for the day in question(Sept 8th, NOT Sept 9th).
The planes are 100% real and confirmed, Egyptian Military assets, they followed Charlie, Erika and TPUSA Faith for years. Why?
The planes were present on the ground and in the air on the day Charlie was assassinated. You got an explanation for that? Because those planes are suspicious as hell.
Candace has repeatedly stated that she will get some things wrong in her investigation, she has. She admits the mistake and moves on.
WHY HAVE THE AUTHORITIES not investigated the things Candace HAS FOUND that are correct?
That's the real question.
Candace Owens DOES NOT HAVE A BADGE! She is forced to investigate without any real authority BECAUSE THE AUTHORITIES ARE NOT DOING THEIR JOB!
If you are DUMB ENOUGH to believe Tyler Robinson killed Charlie with a "magic" 30-06 bullet from less than 200 yards away that DID NOT go completely through his neck I just don't know what to tell you.
You ARE DENYING REALITY(and physics)!
Nitpicking tiny mistakes by Candace DOES NOT invalidate the ocean of LIES AND INCONSISTENCIES she has CORRECTLY DISCOVERED in this case.
TPUSA and Erika Kirk HAVE LIED innumerable times.
That is just a fact. WHY would they lie?
They should have ZERO REASON to lie about anything. Charlie was a national treasure. MILLIONS loved and adored him.
Why on earth would you start LYING about things to do with his murder.
Owen’s motive is the almighty dollar the more outrageous the claim the more views and clicks and YouTube sends her a bigger check. Ignore her is the only thing you can do.
Candace Owens has lost her mind. She is a narcissist desperate for attention. She should have stopped when she got sued by Brigitte Macron for insisting Macron was born male, but Owens just keeps digging.
They may have stripped you of your title, but you'll always be a conspiracy theorist to me.
Another excellent article exposing insanity. People like Candace Owens suffer from brains filled with logical fallacies, masquerading them as facts. I’m now seeing prominent writers starting to attack her, and it’s long overdue.
But her time is coming.
Soon she’s going to be kicked to the curb, and its going to be an expensive kick since these lawsuits are gong to take their toll and she will disappear into the ash heap of history, and not soon enough. I hate to think of what vile things she’ll come up with until then. Her rants border on insane, but her attacks against Erica Kirk are completely despicable and beyond contempt.
By the way, I had to chuckle at your view regarding being a conspiracy theorist as a “promotion”. Well done.
Grokipedia says: Spy vs. Spy is a wordless comic strip series depicting the perpetual rivalry between two spies—one clad in black, the other in white—who devise elaborate schemes and booby traps to eliminate each other, invariably resulting in comedic failure or mutual destruction. Happy Weekend!
I haven’t a clue about Candace Owen’s issues and plan to not follow this one. We must not allow anything to divide the movement as we’ll need to work together once some semblance of justice is achieved for the corrupt politicians.
Interesting that you say the case would not be misdirected because of the lack of political interest. Sometimes coincidences are just coincidences, but Charlie’s nascent desire that TPUSA be audited, along with his cooling towards Israel, and his fierceness against war with Iran made him a target by right, left, and center. Powerful orgs with uncontrollable leaders seem by definition to be in a precarious position.
Add to it the context that this administration forfeited trust by calling the Epstein files a “hoax” and miraculously found the J6 pipe bomber after The Blaze came up with a credible suspect, well...let's just say that I wish you were on this case and not CO.
Candice used to be eloquently reasonable, but now has become as unhinged as the psychotic AWFULs. Given the similarities, could those psychoses have a common cause?
Jack, despite Wikipedia, you’ll always be my favorite conspiracy theorist. I say that myself being a fledging conspiracy theorist in waiting. It came from a lack of belief about so much that has happened going back to the JFK assassination. That one seemed just a bit too pat, the way the pieces of the puzzle fit just right, too right to be true, I’d say contrived.
Being a hunter and a shooter, I didn’t buy the Dealey Plaza scenario and visiting there years later personally and checked the sixth floor “sniper’s nest, and the other “details.” Nothing ever said Oswald to me. Personally, I still think the “Hit” was sanctioned by a politician. Hmm?
I don’t think I was alone in my opinion of brother Ted’s swimming lessons with Mary Jo Kopechne, none of the released “details” worked in that one either.
As for Ron Brown, I recall Clinton walking and joking with someone at the service until he realized someone was filming them and his attitude turned somber abruptly.
There were other events, Erica Kirk seems to be an unlikely match for murder, but I'm willing
With all due respect, Mr. Cashill, there has to be a third possible explanation for the change in your lede at The Pretend Encyclopedia, like simply one of your many admirers momentarily at work, before he gets silenced.
About a week ago, I begged to differ with its hate page for the great replacement theory, which I denied on its talk page is a theory, to begin with. One of the Gauleiter deleted my comment, showered me with insults, and made a first warning, last warning threat. Then when I criticized him for his insults (which violated all Pretend "rules") he had me permablocked.
Recently, Pretendopedia gave me a two-year suspension of editing privileges, but for what I do not know! My edits were infrequent, minor in scope, and never about challenging their approved narratives because that’s an exercise in futility.
But seriously, I thank that cube-dwelling dweeb for taking away my ability to help their content for free.
Gotta up your game Jack.
Can’t let these Johnny-come-lately, wannabe mavens usurp your hard-earned spot on the conspiracy Rushmore. 🙂
Wanna hear my theory?
Candace was very normal until recently. Then she had four children, spaced as fast as her husband (or someone) could get his pants on the bedpost. Aside from the usual female crazy, post-partum craziness is well-known; most common is depression - but other forms exist - and I must wonder if all this hormonal whipsawing has induced a particularly malignant form of post-partum psychosis.
I have also considered Ms. Owens bizarre behavior to possibly be induced by her back-to-back pregnancies.
If not for her dogging Mrs. Macron, I would suspect her behavior towards Erica to be a result of possibly having amorous feelings toward Charlie that were dashed when he wed Erica.
Maybe someone could start looking at Candace who seems to be so sure the guy being tried is not the killer or something.
Just asking questions.
You have zero idea what you are talking about.
Charlie and Candace were BEST FRIENDS, right up until the day he was murdered.
Candace worked with Charlie at TPUSA for years. Toured the world with him. They got famous together.
Then someone ASSASSINATED Candace's best friend, on a livestream, in 4K.
And you wonder WHY Candace is enraged?
Are you mentally challenged?
Imagine your best friend was slaughtered right in front of you. Then understand that when you started looking at THE FACTS surrounding the "official" story of his death that NOTHING ADDED UP!
Then you start investigating, you watch the actual video of Charlie getting shot from the TPUSA feed, you clearly see NO BULLET exiting Charlies neck after he was "supposedly" shot by a rifle that is used to kill a Bull Moose at 1,000 yards. Then the police admit that the "supposed" rifle found at the crime scene WAS NOT THERE during their initial search of that area. Somehow THE FBI "found" it later on.
There's so much more than that here. Yet you just refuse to review the evidence. You cast aspersions for no actual reason at Candace.
Likely because it makes you "FEEL" a certain way.
Stop being LAZY! Go watch her shows. ALL of them, it might take you 3 days. THEN you will have earned the right to call her names.
Now you are just bloviating to make yourself feel virtuous. Which is despicable by the way.
Do better.
You know they were “best friends right up to the day he was murdered” by personal knowledge? Or are you just buying the nonsense she is selling?
"Nonsense" like Tucker and Meghan Kelly both stating that they were best friends. Like the constant stream of text messages FROM CHARLIE that Candace has repeatedly show to the public? "Nonsense" like EVERYONE at TPUSA admitting that Charlie and Candace were best friends? You are just LYING, the question is why?
You mean the text messages from years ago? EVERYONE (what’s with the random upper case words?) at TPUSA "admits they were best friends"?? Where is that documented? You don’t think Charlies’s best friend was the woman he chose to be his wife, mother to his children, and business partner? You sound irrational. Just like Candace.
Two things, Candace has showed messages from 2025 and from all the years before that, go find me the TPUSA post denying that Candace's messages are real. Erika has Charlies phone. She can prove Candace is lying in two seconds. Has she done that?
Go on, get off your butt and do the work.
I'll be right here when you realize you can't find them.
Charlie got played by a psychopathic social climber with a fraudster for a mother.
Sadly it happens every day to all kinds of men.
Even the truly brilliant ones. They never see it coming.
Perhaps Candace should take lessons from Jack on how to properly investigate something to prove a theory.
Attacking and smearing Charlie's widow is a very strange way to prove her case. Thank you for backing up my premise.
Another non-sequitur.
IGNORE CANDACE!
Investigate the FACTS she is showing us all.
Was Charlie shot with a 30-06 rifle from less than 200 yards? No chance
How did FIVE DIFFERENT sets of DNA get on that rifle?
How did The FBI "magically" find that rifle when THE POLICE SEARCH of that area did NOT find it?
How did Erika's best friends daughter GET PULLED FROM THAT TPUSA TRIP to UVU where Charlie got assassinated?
Why was she told not to go on that trip?
Who told her not to go on that trip?
There are HUNDREDS more suspicious and incongruent facts about this case.
NONE OF YOU EVER FOCUS ON THE FACTS!
All you choose to do IS INSULT THE MESSENGER(Candace Owens)!
The question is WHY?
Why are you all IGNORING THE EVIDENCE?
You are really fun. I mean, if fun means "stupid."
Classic non-sequitur. Insult the messenger. YOU are embarrassing yourself.
Crossed my mind also
I'm sorry you feel that way about childbirth and children in general.
I'm not sure how you got that I view having children as a negative. My daughter is one of the greatest blessings in my life! My point, as has also been expressed by others, is that having children in close succession puts an enormous strain on a woman's body. The hormones do have a huge effect on the mother and if she doesn't allow her body enough time to rebound before the next pregnancy, the effects both long and short term can be devastating.
There was a woman in our home school group who suffered depression with each additional child she bore. By the time the 9th baby came along, she was really suffering greatly. It wasn't that she didn't want or love her babies, each one. She was an amazing mother. But the postpartum emotional effects got worse with each baby.
Postpartum depression, etc. IS a thing and the effects of postpartum hormones affects every woman differently. It is not a reason to not have babies, but maybe to be aware of the effects and allow your body to fully recover before having another baby would be beneficial to the mom, the baby, and the entire family.
So yes, I do believe it is very possible Ms. Owens can be suffering from a postpartum induced psychosis.
Candace is living in an extraordinarily dark and negative space. That is not good or normal. Once upon a time not too distant ago, she was a bright, happy, smart, impressive young woman. Nowadays she is carrying some really bad juju. All these people coming to her defense, are doing her a great disservice if they tell her they are her friends. A true friend would try to talk her down and certainly offer copious prayers for Candace and her family. She's not in a good place. She might need some serious spiritual direction. This must be absolute hell for her husband and children.
I'm sorry, I didn't mean it that way. I have a son and homeschooled him as well. He's grown now and married. I have 3 grandchildren. I also homeschooled him through the 8th grade. I have known women in my homeschool group who had 5 to 8 children; some did well, and others did not. We supported each other and carried each other's burdens.
Only God knows if there have been friends who have talked to her and prayed for her. I think they have. I'm praying for her and her family.
I watch Candace's show. I don't agree with everything she says. I watch others investigating the same thing. To me, it's like watching the 48 Hours Show, who did it, what was the motive, etc.
You seem to be a very kind, compassionate, and intuitive person. I say let's agree to keep her in our prayers.
I have often said the same thing about Candace’s pregnancies: Four kids in five years can wreak havoc on your hormones. 😩 She’s gone off the deep end, IMO.
The best theory that I have heard is that Candace wanted to be more than friends with Charlie. When he spurned her, Candace was deeply hurt. Once Charlie died, Candace saw her chance to get back at Erica for taking “her man.”
Not just “her man” but the job she thought she was entitled to, running Turning Point.
Mr.Wills.
"(or someone)"
That sounds like a conspiracy.
Please dish your details...
😁
Here's an interesting question:
WHY DOES EVERYONE JUST ATTACK CANDACE NON-STOP and totally IGNORE the lies, strange actions and outright creepiness of Erika Kirk?
I mean you guys are furious at Candace for NOTICING something.
Erika Kirk is a profligate liar and robotic public speaker with ZERO connection to her audience.
EVERYONE can see these facts.
Candace mentions them, and it's mass hysteria.
WHY?
Why is EVERYONE covering for an incredibly off-putting and emotionally distant Erika Kirk?
There's your "conspiracy" Jack.
The people COVERING for a known liar and a person who has, to say the very least, an ODD origin story.
It’s not only that Candace is mentioning the oddities about Erika: Candace is claiming that Erika (and other members of TPUSA) is somehow complicit in her husband‘s murder. That’s the crux.
She has no straight line evidence even remotely connecting Erika with helping to kill Charlie. Instead, she’s doing this drip, drip, drip of pointing out Erika‘s peccadillos and inconsistencies under the GUISE of trying to prove Erika is involved somehow and destroying her reputation in the process.
Candace clearly doesn’t give a flip about Charlie, or his parents, or his sister or his kids.
It’s disgusting, vile behavior from Candace—and I’m saying that as someone who was a big fan of hers for years.
Candace has never said Erika was involved in Charlie's death. She has said she needs to be "questioned" by the authorities in that matter.
Which would be STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE in any murder case involving a husband with a wife who inherited MILLIONS of dollars.
Why was Erika's best friends daughter PULLED from The UVU trip with Charlie? Who told her she must not go to that event? Why did they tell her that?
All questions for Erika to answer.
Yet no one is asking her.
You are all SHRIEKING at Candace for noticing.
I again ask WHY?
Why all the hate for Candace and NO QUESTIONS FOR THE WOMAN WHO INHERITED ALL THE MONEY?
It REEKS of a cover up.
The only one shrieking is you. Stop projecting
non-sequitur, attacking the messenger.
Nope. You're just uncomfortable that your hypocrisy has been highlighted.
Your whiny shrieking isn't helpful
Do you somehow think this intellectual GARBAGE is going to convince anyone that you are correct in any way?
Make your case. Explain how Charlie got shot by a guy who had never been to UVU before in his life with a gun that COULD NOT POSSIBLY HAVE BEEN THE MURDER WEAPON.
Go on, MAKE THE CASE!
You don't get to just come on here and INSULT people and pretend you have an arguement
I never said that Snow was not at Fort Huachuca; I know he was there. But he confirmed that people were there who were not there and they all had alibis. Yet, Candace propped him up as being a game changer. He’s a grifter. He said the Zodiac Killer was his dad.🤦🏾♀️ If he was such a game changer, then how come Candace isn’t referencing him now? That’s what she does. Her theories fall through the cracks and she pivots to something else.
Egyptian planes DEBUNKED: Check out Kanekoa the Great’s 12/15/25 debunking, PROVING that 66% of Candace’s plane locations were wrong. 60% placed them on the wrong continent.
Candace went online shortly afterwards admitting that her spreadsheet was misleading, and that she was going to correct it. She never did. Still waiting…
So if you still believe the stuff that she’s putting out, I don’t know what to tell you.
And please don’t assume that I believe that Tyler Robinson is the one who killed Charlie. Never said I believed that. But I also don’t believe that Erika or anybody at TPUSA are complicit in his murder.
If she went to the authorities with this so-called evidence, she’d be laughed out of the precinct. They wouldn’t even convene a grand jury on these half-a$$ed speculations.
Bottom line: She needs to show us some concrete, straight-line evidence linking Erika to Charlie’s murder— not the fact that Erika used the word “morfar” instead of “farfar”. Good grief!
If she can’t provide tangible evidence, then she needs to SIT DOWN and raise her four young kids that she had in five years. Pretty sure she is hormonally imbalanced right now.
You might want to start watching her series on Erika and her past. It's not looking good for the sequin robot. She's from the shadiest possible family background. Her biography is littered with lies. Every day that goes by it looks more and more like Charlie was Honey-potted by Erika. Which means it's likely that TPUSA WAS INVOLVED in Charlie's murder via complicity at the least(Tyler Bowyer introduced Charlie to Erika). You can dislike Candace all you want to BUT, she is doing all of us a huge service by SHINING A SPOTLIGHT on the attempted cover-up of Charlie's assassination. He was ORDERED dead. Tyler Robinson is just the patsy. Candace is not law-enforcement, she SHOULD NOT HAVE TO LEAD THIS INVESTIGATION! The FBI and The Utah PD are compromised. Which should be obvious to all by now. Candace does have a GIANT MICROPHONE though, and that might just be enough to bring about some actual justice. For once.
Candace has absolutely implicated Erika in Charlie’s murder. What do you think the Egyptian planes and Fort Huachuca were about?! Both of which have been thoroughly debunked: the planes by Kanekoa on X and the fort by everybody else, because her guest Mitch Snow was a known liar!
Don’t you get it? That’s what Candace does: She throws “questions” out there that seem suspicious and DEMANDS that Erika and everybody else answer those so-called questions. If they don’t, then they MUST be guilty.
Meanwhile, after Kanekoa embarrassed her on X about the planes, she acknowledged that there was something wrong with one of her columns on her chart, and that she would correct it and post it on her website. That was TWO MONTHS ago. I’m still waiting. No apologies from her about that smear against Erika.
Same thing with Mitch Snow. His recollections of what happened at Fort Huachuca, and who he saw there were again, thoroughly debunked. And what does she do? She hosted an X Space to talk about it, got tripped up a couple times, but never apologized to Erika for that debacle. She just leaves it in the universe for people to still think negatively about Erika with the particular incidents.
When is Candace going to answer questions about all of her evidence against Erika and others that turned out to be fake?
When is she going to correct and apologize for the proven damage that she has done so far?
Nothing you state here is true.
Mitch Snow WAS at Fort Huachuca on the day he claimed.
Who he saw is speculative as Candace has always stated.
Erika has provided ZERO confirmed alibi for the day in question(Sept 8th, NOT Sept 9th).
The planes are 100% real and confirmed, Egyptian Military assets, they followed Charlie, Erika and TPUSA Faith for years. Why?
The planes were present on the ground and in the air on the day Charlie was assassinated. You got an explanation for that? Because those planes are suspicious as hell.
Candace has repeatedly stated that she will get some things wrong in her investigation, she has. She admits the mistake and moves on.
WHY HAVE THE AUTHORITIES not investigated the things Candace HAS FOUND that are correct?
That's the real question.
Candace Owens DOES NOT HAVE A BADGE! She is forced to investigate without any real authority BECAUSE THE AUTHORITIES ARE NOT DOING THEIR JOB!
If you are DUMB ENOUGH to believe Tyler Robinson killed Charlie with a "magic" 30-06 bullet from less than 200 yards away that DID NOT go completely through his neck I just don't know what to tell you.
You ARE DENYING REALITY(and physics)!
Nitpicking tiny mistakes by Candace DOES NOT invalidate the ocean of LIES AND INCONSISTENCIES she has CORRECTLY DISCOVERED in this case.
TPUSA and Erika Kirk HAVE LIED innumerable times.
That is just a fact. WHY would they lie?
They should have ZERO REASON to lie about anything. Charlie was a national treasure. MILLIONS loved and adored him.
Why on earth would you start LYING about things to do with his murder.
Unless....
Owen’s motive is the almighty dollar the more outrageous the claim the more views and clicks and YouTube sends her a bigger check. Ignore her is the only thing you can do.
Spot on. I liken click-baiters to masturbators. Owens is a master click-baiter.
Candace Owens has lost her mind. She is a narcissist desperate for attention. She should have stopped when she got sued by Brigitte Macron for insisting Macron was born male, but Owens just keeps digging.
They may have stripped you of your title, but you'll always be a conspiracy theorist to me.
I’d encourage you to go watch some videos of “Brigitte” sitting down 100% a dude.
I admit that I have never seen a woman sit down like that.
Macron is a dude. It’s plain to see..
Another excellent article exposing insanity. People like Candace Owens suffer from brains filled with logical fallacies, masquerading them as facts. I’m now seeing prominent writers starting to attack her, and it’s long overdue.
But her time is coming.
Soon she’s going to be kicked to the curb, and its going to be an expensive kick since these lawsuits are gong to take their toll and she will disappear into the ash heap of history, and not soon enough. I hate to think of what vile things she’ll come up with until then. Her rants border on insane, but her attacks against Erica Kirk are completely despicable and beyond contempt.
By the way, I had to chuckle at your view regarding being a conspiracy theorist as a “promotion”. Well done.
I’m sorry to hear you’ve lost your conspiracy theorist label, Jack.
All that hard work.
She certainly is good at ‘jumping to conclusions’. I keep one ear turned towards her, however. She’s made some pertinent observations.
Grokipedia says: Spy vs. Spy is a wordless comic strip series depicting the perpetual rivalry between two spies—one clad in black, the other in white—who devise elaborate schemes and booby traps to eliminate each other, invariably resulting in comedic failure or mutual destruction. Happy Weekend!
Did you omit it, or did that Grokipedia entry actually discuss Spy vs. Spy without mentioning its creator, Antonio Prohias, or Mad Magazine?
I haven’t a clue about Candace Owen’s issues and plan to not follow this one. We must not allow anything to divide the movement as we’ll need to work together once some semblance of justice is achieved for the corrupt politicians.
Thank you, Jack!
Interesting that you say the case would not be misdirected because of the lack of political interest. Sometimes coincidences are just coincidences, but Charlie’s nascent desire that TPUSA be audited, along with his cooling towards Israel, and his fierceness against war with Iran made him a target by right, left, and center. Powerful orgs with uncontrollable leaders seem by definition to be in a precarious position.
Add to it the context that this administration forfeited trust by calling the Epstein files a “hoax” and miraculously found the J6 pipe bomber after The Blaze came up with a credible suspect, well...let's just say that I wish you were on this case and not CO.
Candice used to be eloquently reasonable, but now has become as unhinged as the psychotic AWFULs. Given the similarities, could those psychoses have a common cause?
Jack, despite Wikipedia, you’ll always be my favorite conspiracy theorist. I say that myself being a fledging conspiracy theorist in waiting. It came from a lack of belief about so much that has happened going back to the JFK assassination. That one seemed just a bit too pat, the way the pieces of the puzzle fit just right, too right to be true, I’d say contrived.
Being a hunter and a shooter, I didn’t buy the Dealey Plaza scenario and visiting there years later personally and checked the sixth floor “sniper’s nest, and the other “details.” Nothing ever said Oswald to me. Personally, I still think the “Hit” was sanctioned by a politician. Hmm?
I don’t think I was alone in my opinion of brother Ted’s swimming lessons with Mary Jo Kopechne, none of the released “details” worked in that one either.
As for Ron Brown, I recall Clinton walking and joking with someone at the service until he realized someone was filming them and his attitude turned somber abruptly.
There were other events, Erica Kirk seems to be an unlikely match for murder, but I'm willing
to listen.
With all due respect, Mr. Cashill, there has to be a third possible explanation for the change in your lede at The Pretend Encyclopedia, like simply one of your many admirers momentarily at work, before he gets silenced.
About a week ago, I begged to differ with its hate page for the great replacement theory, which I denied on its talk page is a theory, to begin with. One of the Gauleiter deleted my comment, showered me with insults, and made a first warning, last warning threat. Then when I criticized him for his insults (which violated all Pretend "rules") he had me permablocked.
Thus, there must be a different explanation.
Recently, Pretendopedia gave me a two-year suspension of editing privileges, but for what I do not know! My edits were infrequent, minor in scope, and never about challenging their approved narratives because that’s an exercise in futility.
But seriously, I thank that cube-dwelling dweeb for taking away my ability to help their content for free.
My best friends mom was in charge of filling the seats on flight 800. She says the plane was full so a lot more died. She has boxes on it
The phrase “A Wrinkle in Time” reminds me of the children’s book by Madeleine L’Engle that I read half a century ago.
Candace specifically said she used the title from that book